|
|
back to boardDoes the Eulerian cycle always exist? I got WA on test 3. Here is my code: Program ex; Const Rule :Array [0..7] Of Integer =(1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128); Var G :Array [1..1001,0..125] Of Byte; Len,M :Integer; St,Ar :Array [1..32010] Of Integer; N,Be :Integer; Procedure Init; Var P,Q,U :Integer; Begin Readln(N,Be); For P:=1 To N Do For Q:=1 To N Do Begin Read(U); If (U=0) And (P<>Q) Then Inc(G[P,(Q-1) Div 8],Rule[(Q-1) Mod 8]); End; End; Procedure Main; Var I,J :Integer; Begin M:=0; Len:=1; St[1]:=Be; Repeat I:=St[Len]; J:=1; Repeat If G[I,(J-1) Div 8] And Rule[(J-1) Mod 8]>0 Then Break; Inc(J); Until J>N; If J<=N Then Begin Dec(G[I,(J-1) Div 8],Rule[(J-1) Mod 8]); Inc(Len); St[Len]:=J; End Else Begin Dec(Len); Inc(M); Ar[M]:=I; End; Until Len=0; If Ar[1]<>Be Then Begin Repeat Until False; End; For I:=1 To M-1 Do Writeln(Ar[I],' ',Ar[I+1]); End; Begin Init; Main; End. I got WA on test 2............. Posted by hello 18 May 2004 22:33 I can't find my mistake........ Who can give me some test........ This is my code : -------------------------------------------------------- const Maxn = 1010 ; var h : Array [0..Maxn,0..100] Of Integer ; l : Array [0..Maxn] Of Integer ; list : Array [0..66000] Of Integer ; len , n , first , x : LongInt ; procedure init ; var i , j , k : Integer ; begin read ( n , first ) ; for i := 1 to n do for j := 1 to n do begin read ( k ) ; if ( k = 0 ) and ( i <> j ) then begin Inc ( l[i] ) ; h[i,l[i]] := j ; end; end; end; procedure Dfs ( k : Integer ) ; begin While l[k] > 0 do begin Dec ( l[k] ) ; Dfs ( h[k,l[k]+1] ) ; end; Inc ( len ) ; list[len] := k ; end; procedure out ; var i : LongInt ; begin if n > 1 then begin write ( list[1] ) ; for i := 2 to len - 1 do begin writeln ( ' ' , list[i] ) ; write ( list[i] ) ; end; writeln ( ' ' , list[len] ) ; end; end; begin init ; Dfs ( first ) ; out ; end. Re: WA#3 I was getting WA3 until understood, that my program gives a wrong output on the following test: 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 To my mind, the only possible answer is as follows: 2 3 3 1 1 2 And my old solution output just the opposite, i.e. 2 1 1 3 3 2 Good luck (! rafailka. Edited by author 13.03.2005 10:02 Re: WA#3 Posted by Yu Xin 2 Jun 2005 18:29 Thanks. |
|
|