|
|
back to boardwhy this algo is wrong Posted by nomercy 14 Feb 2016 15:52 ans.push_back(2); ans.push_back(2); for (int i = 2;;++i){ if (i == n){ ans.push_back(i); break; } ans.push_back(i+1); ans.push_back(i-1); ans.push_back(i); } WA3 if n==5 answer 12 2 2 3 1 2 4 2 3 5 3 4 5 Edited by author 14.02.2016 15:53 Edited by author 14.02.2016 15:53 Re: why this algo is wrong Here's a simple program testing your answer. It outputs all the possible paths when the figure is still not found. You can modify constants in the header to test another one. program test1789; const nmoves = 12; nwidth = 5; mv: array[1..nmoves] of longint = (2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 5, 3, 4, 5); var i: longint; path: array[0..nmoves] of longint; procedure Solve(v, z: longint); var q: longint; begin if (v < 1) or (v > nwidth) then exit; if z > nmoves then begin for q:=0 to nmoves do write(path[q], ' '); writeln; end else begin //if (v < 1) or (v > nwidth) then exit; if v = mv[z] then exit; path[z]:=v - 1; Solve(v - 1, z + 1); path[z]:=v + 1; Solve(v + 1, z + 1); end; end; begin for i:=1 to nwidth do begin path[0]:=i; Solve(i, 1); end; end. UPD: A small fix, moving one line into a proper place. Edited by author 14.02.2016 16:28 Re: why this algo is wrong Posted by nomercy 14 Feb 2016 17:17 thanks |
|
|