|
|
back to boardStatement lies: there are test cases when crosses needs two moves to win Statement lies: there are test cases when crosses needs two moves to win. That pisses me off, because it's always a great challange to understand the right meaning of a statement, but this one just doesn't give you a chance to do that. Re: Statement lies: there are test cases when crosses needs two moves to win I think, there is no cases when crosses win in two moves Re: Statement lies: there are test cases when crosses needs two moves to win I think, there is no cases when crosses win in two moves There are at least 3 cases that I found in the discussions: #X# #OX XOO #X# O#O XOX X## O#X XOO |
|
|