|
|
вернуться в форумSuffix.tree-Ura Послано svr 5 фев 2008 13:44 Finally I implemented effectively O(n) suffix tree! Most understable McCreight algo and Shen(Шень) explanation. Now ~ 10 big string problem in timus will be simple. In 1590 enaught to find sum of length edges of the tree. Edited by author 05.02.2008 13:48 Re: Suffix.tree-Ura I absolutely agree with you. Problem can be easily solved tith Suffix tree. I used Ekkonen algo and got AC :-)) Re: Suffix.tree-Ura I used Suffix Automaton and got AC ) Re: Suffix.tree-Ura LOL Why? it is O(|S|) algorithm) Edited by author 30.08.2009 03:58Re: Suffix.tree-Ura It's wonderful =) Re: Suffix.tree-Ura LOL Why? it is O(|S|) algorithm) Edited by author 30.08.2009 03:58If your algorithm is fast, you can try to solve the same problem - 1706 =) Re: Suffix.tree-Ura Послано svr 2 сен 2009 23:22 Thank for very interesting suggestion. 1706 was seems for me as absolutely separated and new problem. Re: Suffix.tree-Ura Is it a joke? Re: Suffix.tree-Ura Послано svr 6 сен 2009 12:13 Thank again. You are right and I am wrong. I simply take solution from 1590(my suff_tree_implementation) and got Ac for 1706 with one submission. Interesting that I forgotten all details but this fact doesn’t inhibit using of subprogram. Edited by author 06.09.2009 12:19 Re: Suffix.tree-Ura It's interesting to compare suffix tree and prefix function for these two problems. Suffix tree works faster on N1590, but much slower on N1706. Re: Suffix.tree-Ura to my mind, the best algorithm for both 1590 and 1706 is hash. =) Re: Suffix.tree-Ura Послано svr 10 сен 2009 00:50 For me all probabalistics algos are nonsense. The are good for contests but how can we imaginate them as basis of control in real life. They have not scintists value! |
|
|