|
|
back to boardHow about case M>N(+)? Posted by SPIRiT 29 Oct 2007 23:18 I think it's clear for the system of linear equations, that if M<N, than it's impossible. If M=N then it may be possible (and I know how to check). How about case M>N? We need to select N pairs that get an unambiguous solution? Re: How about case M>N(+)? You have to keep only the lineary independet ones, I think. What I did is I kept only the first 5 ones, which contain certain number (so the matrix in the end was at most 5000 rows long, containing at least 5 rows, containing a digit at each position) and it passed system test (otherwise the solution was right, but too slow) Re: How about case M>N(+)? Just find at least one odd loop in each connected component Re: How about case M>N(+)? Posted by test 24 Apr 2010 20:49 Just find at least one odd loop in each connected component hmm i make this but i get TLE( test 12)... (with a BFS) any ideea why? Re: How about case M>N(+)? What I did is I kept only the first 5 ones, which contain certain number Strange. It will not work for this test (A_i can be arbitrary). 43 43 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 4 0 1 5 0 1 6 0 1 7 0 2 8 0 2 9 0 2 10 0 2 11 0 2 12 0 2 13 0 3 14 0 3 15 0 3 16 0 3 17 0 3 18 0 3 19 0 4 20 0 4 21 0 4 22 0 4 23 0 4 24 0 4 25 0 5 26 0 5 27 0 5 28 0 5 29 0 5 30 0 5 31 0 6 32 0 6 33 0 6 34 0 6 35 0 6 36 0 6 37 0 7 38 0 7 39 0 7 40 0 7 41 0 7 42 0 7 43 0 Edited by author 20.01.2018 04:30 |
|
|