|
|
back to boardHas anybody had WA 14? Posted by mai7 27 Feb 2007 02:15 I can't understand, why?! I've tried for many times to change accuracy value and borders of searching (is -10000..10000 enough?), can anybody? please, help me? Re: Has anybody had WA 14? Posted by svr 27 Feb 2007 08:09 There is fine mathematical theory about precision for multyple roots(symbolic algebra of polinomials,Gries,...) Acording it to achive precision 10^-6 will enouh to use near 200 digits in all calculations. Thus Java and BigInteger best way to pass tests. Re: Has anybody had WA 14? Did anybody solve this test without long arithmetics? I found roots of a polynom and then check if they are roots of its derivatives to determine their repeatness, but got WA#14. Is there a better way to calculate roots? |
|
|